UK wholesalers agreed to stop selling the distinctive pink and purple note last month after SOCA investigators found nine out of ten were used for illegal activities. The move is likely to heap pressure on the European Central Bank to withdraw the note from circulation entirely. It remains legal tender in the UK and there are fears British criminals will now simply source their 500 euro notes on the continent, or turn to the smaller value 200 euro note which is worth £170.[From Britain axes 500 euro note over organised crime fears | Mail Online]
SOCA is the Serious Organised Crime Agency, the British version of the FBI I suppose. They must be pleased that we have done away with the dreaded Osama, musn’t they? Perhaps this is the action that David Lewis, Head of Anti-Money Laundering in the Financial Crime Unit at Her Majesty’s Treasury, was referring to a few weeks ago when I was whining on about high-value banknotes at a seminar.
But hold on. As the stories make clear, the British haven’t banned the Osama at all. In fact, I’m sure that stopping the wholesale distribution will have absolutely zero impact on the circulation of the notes in the UK, since criminals will just buy them down the pub instead of in banks. But it’s the thought that counts, isn’t it
Interestingly, this move once again puts Britain at odds with it’s neighbours. The European Commission’s draft statement on legal tender (I’d never heard of this before today, so thanks twitterverse for the pointers) contains fullsome support for the Osama.
According to a commission recommendation issued on Monday (22 March), retailers should not be allowed to put up signs banning the use of high-value banknotes. Refusal to accept these bills is fine from time to time if a shopowner is out of change at a given moment, but this should not be a permanent rule, the commission has said.[From EUobserver / Commission frowns on shop signs that say: ‘€500 notes not accepted’]
Now, some might find the Commission’s support for notes that the British police say have “no credible legitimate use” rather puzzling. After all, the Commission ought to want to support member states in cracking down on tax evasion, money laundering, drug smuggling, people trafficking and avoiding Spanish property taxes (which, as I understand, are the principal uses of the Osamas). And from the e-payments world, the Commission’s astonishing support for the least efficient payment mechanism, cash, is frankly bizarre.
Finding the tiny one- and two-cent coins more trouble than they are worth, Finland and the Netherlands have adopted rules rounding up prices to the nearest five cents, but Brussels says states should refrain from further such rules and stressed the right to use one- and two-cent coins.[From EUobserver / Commission frowns on shop signs that say: ‘€500 notes not accepted’]
This is all very odd. If the Commission is serious about “Digital Europe” then a more efficient payment system that is based on a level playing field — between cash and e-payments — should be at the heart of it.
I suppose governments may have been happy to turn a blind eye toward drug dealing and money laundering the past because the seigniorage revenues coming in from banknotes were a useful source of pin money for the exchequer, but things have changed in recent years. Two thing in particular: the use of cash by terrorists and the economic crisis. The latter, more than the former, is going to reshape the European e-payments world in the not-too-distant future. Look at this morning’s news from Greece…
A dozen orthopaedic doctors had their bank deposits frozen after authorities found that, out of €31m of deposits made in 2001-08, only €12m had been declared as income. Some doctors were declaring smaller net incomes than the average annual rent in the area.[From RTÉ Business: Greek worries spark tourism crisis]
Governments are now desperate for more sources of tax revenue and one of the biggest barriers they face in obtaining it is the currency that they themselves are supplying!
Mafia money launderers, terrorists and tax dodgers may be accumulating 500-euro bills because they’re easy to hide and transport, the Bank of Italy said in a report.[From 500-Euro Bill Lifts Crime Risk, Bank of Italy Says (Update1) – BusinessWeek]
I have no explanation why the European Commission and the European Central Bank (ECB) do not see the rather obvious link between less regulated parts of the economy and the provision of high-value banknotes.
‘The ECB refuses to accept that 500 euro notes should be scrapped,’ says a spokesman at the bank.[From How the 500 euro is financing a global crime wave of cocaine trafficking, the black market and tax evasion | Mail Online]
The amounts of money involved must be huge. In some countries, the “grey economy” is substantial fraction of all economic activity. Here’s just one figure. The share of the grey economy in Bulgaria’s Gross Domestic Product is about 37 per cent, according to a study by AT Kearney and Visa Europe. Peter Ayliffe, president and chief executive of Visa Europe, said in an interview in June 2009. The share of the grey economy in GDPs across Europe varied, he said, from 10 per cent in the UK to about 40 per cent in some countries in Central and Eastern Europe. If a third of the economy is grey and this can be reduced by half because of a switch from cash to e-payments, then not only will governments raise more revenue but the rest of us can play less tax.
These opinions are my own (I think) and presented solely in my capacity as an interested member of the general public [posted with ecto]