Written by “Clearly, in the long run, mobile wins,” says Consult Hyperion’s Birch. “For most people, in most of the world, most of the time, the mobile phone is the most important device.”
[From FST]
Now, in some advanced countries, it is seen as natural to being to transfer applications that hinge on identity over to the most personal interweb interface, the mobile phone. An interesting case study is Estonia. We’ve looked before at Estonia’s use of new technology and they are back at the forefront this month:
Lawmakers approved a measure Thursday allowing citizens to vote by mobile phone in the next parliamentary elections in 2011… The mobile-voting system, which has already been tested, requires that voters obtain free, authorized chips for their phones, said Raul Kaidro, spokesman of the SK Certification Center, which issues personal ID cards in Estonia.
[From Estonia to vote by mobile phone in 2011 – International Herald Tribune]
This is a similar architecture to that being deployed in Turkey, where the key pair at the heart of scheme is stored in the SIM and the on-board application uses it for digital signatures.
So if the future — in fact, the present — is mobile, wouldn’t people developing major new IT systems — with a strong identity component — have mobile technology at the heart of the vision and make the mobile exploitation of the infrastructure a key element in the public proposition?
These opinions are my own (I think) and are presented solely in my capacity as an interested member of the general public [posted with ecto]
